This article in the NY Times is pretty interesting:
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/05/abandoning-an-attempt-to-create-an-urban-village/?scp=6&sq=alternative+housing&st=cseThe group from New York sounds a lot like the approach Kathryn McCamant described at BSU last week. That approach will require financing from our beloved banking system -- that may be a dependency we can't afford.
I wonder if we could start an eco-village community instead with less money, and just pay for costs over time with cash? Of course, the housing wouldn't be near as nice as what Kathryn showed us, but I don't know if the financial system will recover any time soon enough, making a Kathryn-type project feasible.
My current vision (subject to change) is that the eco-village might only have a few people living there full time, and other investors would live and work there on the weekends and holidays, possibly moving in later should the need or opportunity arise.
Does this approach make sense to anyone else?